"Body Odor" was first coined in 1933 by the makers of Lifebuoy soap. People have always smelled, but a fear of our own scent was thrust upon us by corporations. But I wondered if maybe some people had body odor that didn't stink, but rather smelled pleasant. I remember reading that Alexander the Great had yummy B.O. I haven't showered today. So body odor has come to mind. But I think I smell good. Not a cologne or deodorant good, but sweet, a scent that my own body produces, or more likely, a scent that the bacteria on my body produces. Someone should make a bacteria-based deodorant. The microbes would eat your sweat and dead skin, and emit cologne or perfume. The only problems I could see: The bacteria gets out of control and starts eating our skin. The bacteria causes explosive diarrhea when eaten. The bacteria produces too much scent, and makes you smell like a prostitute. The bacteria scares people, so they don't buy it. We may need only apply it once. I...
believing that war is good for the economy is a good thing to believe because it's true...it does help the economy. doesn't mean it's a good way to help the economy though.
ReplyDeleteThe idea "war is good for the economy" has been repeated so often as to become an accepted truism.
ReplyDeleteIf war is good for the economy, why don't we conspire with one of our allies to build the largest navies in the world. Then we can send our ships into the middle of the pacific, and, because life is precious, we can evacuate all of the sailors. Then let us sink the ships.
This sort of nonsense would certainly be good business for ship builders, but for few others. It results in a net loss of capital.
If war were good for the economy, then so would be burning down your house, or blowing up your car. Destruction, by definition, destroys wealth.
A war economy certainly creates jobs, by funneling money away from what taxpayers would have spent their money on, and giving it to the merchants of death.